Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Ed Schultz: A Lot Of Americans "Don't Want To Hear About Bush Anymore" | RealClearPolitics

Real Clear Politics Video

The Latest Politics, News & Election Videos

Ed Schultz: A Lot Of Americans "Don't Want To Hear About Bush Anymore"

Ed Schultz, host of "The Ed Show" on MSNBC: "About the convention, is there is such a thing as Bush burnout? There might be a lot of Americans out there who don't want to hear about Bush anymore. They know all about what he did. It's moving forward, and I think that's pretty much the campaign that the Obama people are pushing right now. Is Bush going to be a key part of the Democratic National Convention conversation?"

Rep. Chris van Hollen (D-MD): "No -- no he's not because, let me make this -- I think this is an important point. Yes, we inherited a mess from George Bush but the issue now is where do we go in the future? And the point we're making is if you listen to what Romney and Ryan are doing, they're proposing the same economic strategy that got us in this mess. So we're saying, let's look at the future, you've got a choice."

In The News

Most Watched

Video Archives - September 2012


Sunday, March 11, 2012

Barak Obama is legally White

If we were to use colonial law as precedent, "America's first black president" is actually White.

According to colonial law the race of a person was determined maternally, not paternally. That is, the person's race was considered to be the same as the mother, not the father.

Children born to White women in colonial times were legally deemed White, even if their fathers were black or Indian.

From that perspective Barak Obama is legally a White male because his mother was White.


Black history: First American slaveholder was black

The first person in American history to own a slave was a black landowner and successful farmer.

Anthony Johnson came to the American colonies in August, 1619 as an indentured servant. In 1623 Johnson had completed his indenture and was recognized as a free negro. In 1651 he acquired 250 acres of land in Virginia, later adding another 250 acres; a sizable holding at the time.

John Casor, a black indentured servant employed by Johnson, became America's first slave after a legal dispute with Robert Parker. Parker was a white colonist who employed Casor while Casor was still indentured to Johnson. Johnson sued Parker in Northampton Court in 1654. The court  upheld Johnson's right to hold Casor as a slave on March 8, 1655. The court found:

The court seriously consideringe and maturely weighing the premisses, doe fynde that the saide Mr. Robert Parker most unjustly keepeth the said Negro from Anthony Johnson his master ... It is therefore the Judgement of the Court and ordered That the said John Casor Negro forthwith returne unto the service of the said master Anthony Johnson, And that Mr. Robert Parker make payment of all charges in the suit.

Five years later, in 1670, the colonial assembly passed legislation permitting blacks and Indians the right to own slaves of their own race, but prohibiting them from owning White slaves.

By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. By 1860 there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in the city of New Orleans alone.


Thursday, March 8, 2012

Myths persist: Race of serial killers and school shooters

Recent news has turned our attention to serial killers and school shooters. Both groups are stereotypically presumed to be White; or mostly White.

The truth is: Serial killers are not atypically White. In fact the FBI reports that, based on U.S. population percentages, White serial killers are not more common than other races.

Recently in the news is Vincent Groves, a black serial killer who was imprisoned after killing twelve people. Groves emerged in this news this week after DNA evidence linked him to four other murders.

The recent school shooting in Ohio last week focused our attention on similar tragedies. Again, most Americans believe the stereotypical profile that school shooters are almost always White. Statistics, however, prove otherwise. 55 percent of school shooters are black.

Blacks comprise 13 percent of America's population.


General information about black serial killers
Racial characteristics of serial killers
Vincent Groves news article
School shooters statistics
List of black serial killers (2009)

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Paula Deen and Racial Intolerance

Summary: Portraying the Old South in a positive manner is anathema the social engineers.

There was a time in America when social engineers employed eugenics to eradicate those it deeemed unacceptable. Common tools were steriization and castration.

21st century eugenists employ a similar strategy to purge society of undisirables: Stigmatization and ostracization.

The Confederate flag, once a staple of Dixe pride, has been stigmatized as an emblem of evil rather than an icon of Southern heritage. Even 'General Lee', the car used in the 'Dukes of Hazzard' TV sitcom, was banned from appearing at a recent NASCAR event.

People are also victims of 21st-century eugenics.

Advocates of tolerance will not tolerate anyone who wavers from multicultural orthodoxy. Though not illegal, the punishment for saying (or just 'being') out of line with diversity's dictates is severe. Recall the punishment received by Don Imus. The radio talkster dared notice that black women have nappy hair and, in a moment of levity, used the phrase 'nappy-headed hos." There was no arrest warrant, no investigation, and no trial before peers. Rather, Imus was effectively lynched by a national mob of intolerant eugenicists hell-bent on purging society of their concept of undesirables.

A most recent target of intolerance is the vivacious TV personality, Paula Deen.

Deen's crime is that her cooking specialty reflects the Old South. Her Southern drawl, personal appeal and kitchen talent place her on a par with one considered 'feebleminded' in the 1920s.

Deen has been sued. Her crime is being a racist. The evidence points to her desire to host a plantation-sytle wedding reminiscent of a Shirley Temple movie.

Historical symbols and beloved personalities seem to be the preferred targets of those wishing to eradicate America's traditional cultures. The tragedy is, they are succeeding. And anyone who dares oppose them is promptly labeled a 'racist'.



Sunday, March 4, 2012

Genetic traits and denial

Sandy Allen stood 7 feet, 7.24 inches tall.

The Guinness Book of World Records proclaimed Allen to the be the tallest woman in the world; a title she held for years.

One could argue -- erroneously -- that Allen's height proves that women are as tall as men. Such an argument, of course, is nonsense.

W.E.B. DuBois was an intellectual.

He graduated from Harvard where he became the first black American to earn a doctorate degree.

One could argue -- erroneously -- that DuBois' intellect proves that blacks are as intelligent as Whites. That argument, again, is nonsense.

Allen's stature and DuBois brain have virtually no effect on norms and averages. Allen's  height does not prove that women are taller, shorter or of equal stature to men. DuBois' intellect does not prove that blacks are smarter, dumber or intellectually equal to Whites.

Nonetheless there are those who point to the brilliance of gifted blacks as slam-dunk evidence. It disproves overwhelming scientific evidence that white people, on average, are more intelligent than blacks.

They adhere to an irrational dogma of social theory. That theory postulates that disparities in intelligence between ethnic groups is falsified by environment. When the environment is altered to accommodate under-performing ethnic groups, the disparities will disappear.

Both academic research and overwhelming real-life experience and observation defies their opinions. Nonetheless, the persevere. That compels us to ask, "Why?" There is a reason.

Pressing an agenda

There are those whose world view sees Western culture as a global bully. Europeans are colonialists who dominate other peoples, particularly those of the Southern hemisphere. As long as that domination persists, people of color will never experience a quality of life on parity with the West. In their minds, the problem is not a disparity of intellectual ability. It is an economic disparity that can only be remedied by redistributing the wealth of the Western world. That solution will be realized when the Eurosphere is overwhelmed through migration from the Third World.

The problem with that world view can be summed in two simple words: It's wrong.

The economic disparity that has existed for millenia  between Europe and Third World nations is wholly intellectual.

What is true on a global scale is also observed in multi-cultural societies.

To drive through a major American metropolitan area is to experience by observation the gradation of intelligence. To wind one way through low-rent, black-dominated ghettos and emerge surrounded by the manicured-lawns of Whitopia is to journey through areas inhabited by adults with low IQs and arrive in an area where the populace is more intelligent.

It is true that such a drive allows one to observe economic disparity. That disparity, however, is the effect of varying intelligence. Smart people are generally more capable of earning higher incomes than those less blessed.

Forcing neighborhoods to integrate through housing initiatives will do nothing to bridge the gap. Section-8 high rises erected in suburbia and populated with black people will do nothing to resolve the disparity. The disparity is innate. It is genetic. Only the most foolish would suppose that force-merging ethnic groups could alter the DNA of those less capable of earning a living.

Furthermore, forcing government schools to racially integrate cannot erase the disparity of academic performance between black and white students. Oddly, those who advocate integrated schools as a remedy for low academic performance among black students fail to acknowledge that the brain is physiological component of human anatomy. It's function is genetically predetermined as is skin tone, hair texture and skeletal structure. It is foolish to suppose that integrating schools would cause the skin color of blacks to lighten, their hair to straighten, or their skeletal structure to morph into that of their White schoolmates.

Advocates of integration are undeterred. In spite of decades of practical evidence to the contrary, they adhere to the theory that placing black and white students in identical educational environments will remove the racial disparity in academic performance. Forced integration, they conclude, is the only means to assure absolute identical environments. The concept of 'separate but equal' is anathema to integrationists.

Killing the golden goose

The destruction of Western culture, therefore, cannot resolve the disparities between ethnic groups.

What, then, will be the outcome?

Once Western culture is disabled, the resources of the White infrastructure will disappear. European nations will no longer be capable of sending aid to sub-Saharan Africans. Television commercials pleading for white viewers to send money to support brown children in Central and South America will grow silent. There will be no cash to fund EBT cards or underwrite Section-8 housing. Welfare systems will collapse. Society norms of peace and tranquility will be impossible to maintain.

In other words, the intentional erosion of White culture will have severe consequences for people of color who are dependent upon that culture for survival. Advocates of diversity are destroying the very people they claim to be helping. They are killing the goose that lays the golden egg.

[The development of this article is in progress.]